Tips for using GL04P with UK SIM

During I'm visiting temporary for taking business course at London, I tried using my GL04P of e-mobile Pocket Wi-Fi device to insert UK's SIM.

There were two tips. I write for user of GL04P in abroad.

1. Necessary to buy a SIM "for data".
  GL04P could not work with general SIM for phone.
  It's a little expensive than a general SIM of buying on a vending machine of Heathrow airport.

2. Managing through a setting page of GL04P.
  At first, you should set "available" of international roaming service.
  Without that, if GL04P catch a signal but you cannot use 3G --- not indicated 3G mark.

Who is submitting a big order of Smart TV to Foxconn?

These days, there are a lot of news related to the display industry with Foxconn.

Hon Hai acquires flat panel patents from NEC

As you know, Foxconn was approaching Sharp corporation, but perhaps the deal would be collapsed...

It seems Foxconn is taking an active stance to glean intangible assets...don't you think?

Until now it was not necessary to care for patents of displays depending on indemnification of outsourcers of own, because they has been collaborated with "existing" TV makers.

Maybe Foxconn might be receiving an order of display goods from non-TV maker.

And perhaps these actions won't be hurting existing TV makers, probably existing-TV makers would not create an innovative goods using a display unfortunately.

For a lot of people who would become an user of innovative display goods, it is good news because they will be able to get it without extra money of patents.

It's NOT perception gap from nationality

About Liancourt Rocks(Takeshima/Dokudo), I've read the history between pre-WW2 and now. Please read "Chronology" of below, because English wikipedia page is not enough.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liancourt_Rocks

I think this issue has been coming from "differences in way of making decision based on what" each other, it is NOT from "perception gap". Japan's decision/action depended on the US's decision at that time, these mind might have been trusted completely on Japan. Non-Japanese people would not believe.

When Japan was under the US control, perhaps they would not have expressed an opinion at all. The so-called "Japanese loyalty mind(A bargain is a bargain---In Japanese: Bushi-ni-Ni-gon-Nashi)".

As a Japanese people, it would be felt the island was stolen from South Korea. 

I would write back to the point of view from the history.

Surely, Japanese government had been discovered the deserted island in 17th century, and decided it as a national land on early 20th century.

While above, Japanese people had found Korean people on this island in 1692.

The different things from Senkaku/Diaoyutai island issue, there are no-evidence of "the first country to discover as the deserted island" from government probably. Unfortunately it was in Edo-era of Japan(under the national isolation). I think this fact must be the one of discussion point with this issue.

I guess the other discussion point is "the action of Japan and South Korea, of when the US had been controlling Japan".

As you know South Korea had spread out "Syngman Rhee Line" in 1952. About the same time Japan had become silent, because an above reason of Japanese mind. Probably you might think Japanese attitude is absurd, although this is Japanese loyalty and responsibility.

Either way, if it goes on as same as now, this issue will remain between two countries as ever.

I feel it is difficult to say which country is taking a right action. However it is necessary to be understanding behavioral characteristic themselves more. I would like to say for a lot of Japanese, people should find that excessive Japanese loyalty mind would be harmful on multilaterally negotiation.

Additionally I say one more thing at last. Honestly I don't like to make an opinion about international discord in Japanese. Almost Japanese(or Asian?) people speaks just short-sighted opinion, it is not constructive. It is too stressful for me...sigh...